Age Estimation of
Hypogenic Caves in the Mozduran Formation (NE Iran): Implications for Karst
Evolution
Mike Buchanan 2025
Abstract
Keywords: Hypogenic caves, Mozduran Formation, karst,
Jurassic carbonates, Iran, palaeokarst, speleogenesis
1.
Introduction
Karst systems are among the most dynamic geological
environments, shaped by chemical dissolution, tectonic processes, and
hydrological interactions. While epigenic caves formed by meteoric infiltration
are widely studied, hypogenic caves remain comparatively under-researched in
Iran despite their significance for regional palaeogeography and hydrogeology
(Klimchouk, 2007).
Hypogenic caves are characterised by bottom-up development,
where ascending fluids enriched with carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide, or
thermal energy dissolve carbonate rocks (Palmer, 1991; Klimchouk, 2012). Their
recognition within Iranian carbonate provinces, particularly the Mozduran
Formation, provides a valuable opportunity to integrate local karst studies
into global speleogenetic frameworks (Ford and Williams, 2007).
This study aims to:
1. Establish
the age of hypogenic caves in the Mozduran Formation.
2. Relate
their development to Late Jurassic carbonate platform evolution.
3. Compare Iranian hypogenic caves with international analogues.
2. Geological Background
2.1 Regional Geological Setting
The Mozduran Formation crops out extensively in
north-eastern Iran. It consists predominantly of shallow marine carbonates
deposited on a broad carbonate platform during the Late Jurassic. The formation
is underlain by the Kashafrud (Shemshak) Formation and overlain by the Shurijeh
red clastic deposits, with regional equivalents including the Lar Limestone
(Central Alborz) and the Esfandiar Limestone (Tabas region).
2.2 Stratigraphic Context
Biostratigraphic evidence constrains the Mozduran Formation
to the Oxfordian–Kimmeridgian interval (163.5–152.1 Ma). Fossil assemblages of
ammonites and benthic fauna confirm its placement within a warm, shallow marine
depositional setting (Hypogenic Cave Formation Age Estimation for Mozduran
Formation, 2025).
Formation Stratigraphic
Position Absolute Age
(Ma) Equivalent
Formations (Regional)
Shurijeh
Formation Overlying unit ~150 Ma Red
clastics (Kopeh Dagh)
Mozduran
Formation Study unit 163.5–152.1 Lar CaCO3 (Alborz),
Esfandiar CaCO3 (Tabas)
Kashafrud
Formation Underlying unit >163.5 Ma Shemshak
Group equivalents
3.
Methods
3.1 Stratigraphic Correlation
Age determination relies on correlation between cave-hosting
strata and well-dated fossiliferous sequences.
3.2 Hypogenic Process Modelling
Cave formation mechanisms were inferred from lithological
evidence, dissolution morphology, and analogues from international case studies
(Klimchouk, 2007; Palmer, 1991).
3.3 Age Calculation
Numerical estimates use absolute stage boundaries. With the
Oxfordian base at 163.5 Ma and Kimmeridgian top at 152.1 Ma, the cave system’s
age is constrained between 150–163.5 Ma, averaging 157.8 Ma.
Figure 2. Simplified speleogenetic model of hypogenic cave
formation in the Mozduran Formation (after Klimchouk, 2007).
4.1 Cave Age
The hypogenic caves of the Mozduran Formation are estimated
to be ~157.8 Ma, ranking them among the oldest hypogenic karst systems in the
Iranian plateau.
4.2 Geological Conditions of Formation
• Extensive
carbonate platform development.
• Shallow
marine environments with high carbonate productivity.
• Tectonic
stability favouring long-term hypogene dissolution.
4.3 Preservation Features
Caves exhibit evidence of:
• Multiple
phases of mineral deposition.
• Terra
rossa infilling and sedimentary occlusion.
• Minimal
erosional destruction due to tectonic stability.
Table 1. Estimated age range of Mozduran hypogenic caves.

Oxfordian 163.5–157.3 Initial hypogenic activity Marine carbonate platform at peak
Kimmeridgian 157.3–152.1 Active hypogenic dissolution Terra rossa deposition begins
Average Age
Estimate 157.8 - Minimum
cave age today ~150 Ma
5.
Discussion
5.1 Hypogenic Speleogenesis in Iran
The Mozduran system illustrates classic hypogenic features:
bottom-up enlargement, deep groundwater circulation, and chemical interaction
with carbonates (Klimchouk, 2012).
5.2 Comparison with Global Analogues
Comparable hypogenic systems occur in:
• The
Carpathian Basin (Klimchouk, 2007).
• The
Guadalupe Mountains, USA (Palmer, 1991).
• The
Geneva Basin, Switzerland, where dolomitization influenced karst evolution
(Makhloufi et al., 2018).
5.3 Terra Rossa as a Paleoclimate Indicator
The development of terra rossa within Mozduran caves
reflects prolonged subaerial weathering and residual soil accumulation,
consistent with Mediterranean karst terrains (Martín-Pérez et al., 2010).
5.4 Implications for Iranian Karst Research
This study demonstrates that Iranian hypogenic caves:
• Provide a
deep-time perspective on karst evolution.
• Serve as
archives of paleoenvironmental change.
• Should be
integrated into global karst models (Ford and Williams, 2007).
6.
Conclusions
• Hypogenic caves in the Mozduran
Formation formed between 163.5–152.1 Ma, averaging +- 157.8 Ma.
• Their development was controlled by
hypogene fluid circulation during Late Jurassic carbonate platform evolution.
• Terra rossa deposits and
sedimentary occlusion record paleoenvironmental transitions.
• Iranian karst researchers can use
Mozduran caves as analogues for global hypogenic speleogenesis.
Future research should include:
• Isotopic
dating (U-Th, Sr isotopes).
• Fluid
inclusion studies.
• Comparative
petrographic analyses with Alborz and Tabas carbonate provinces.
1.
Ford, D.C. and Williams, P. (2007) Karst
Hydrogeology and Geomorphology. Chichester: Wiley.
2.
Hypogenic Cave Formation Age Estimation for
Mozduran Formation (2025) Unpublished manuscript.
3.
Klimchouk, A. (2007) ‘Hypogene speleogenesis:
hydrogeological and morphogenetic perspective’, Special Paper 1. Carlsbad:
National Cave and Karst Research Institute.
4.
Klimchouk, A. (2012) ‘Speleogenesis, hypogene’,
in White, W.B. and Culver, D.C. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Caves. 2nd edn.
Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp. 748–765.
5.
Makhloufi, Y., Rusillon, E., Brentini, M., et
al. (2018) ‘Dolomitization of the Upper Jurassic carbonate rocks in the Geneva
Basin, Switzerland and France’, Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 111, pp. 475–500.
doi:10.1007/s00015-018-0311-x.
6.
Martín-Pérez, A., Salinas, R., De Waele, J., et
al. (2010) ‘Terra rossa development in karst terrains: a Mediterranean
example’, Geomorphology, 118(3–4), pp. 193–206.
7.
Palmer, A.N. (1991) ‘Origin and morphology of
limestone caves’, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 103(1), pp. 1–21.
Comments