Hypogenic Overprinting, Radionuclide Activity and Diurnal Ventilation: Redrawing the Foundations of Speleothem-Based Paleoclimate Reconstructions

Mike Buchanan 2025

 

Abstract

Cave microclimates are traditionally seen as stable environments with minimal thermal variability and predictable airflow patterns. However, this perspective fails to account for disruptive forces such as hypogenic supersaturation events, radionuclide-induced speleogenesis and nuanced diurnal ventilation. These karst system phenomena not only influence cave morphology and microclimate but also undermine the foundational assumptions of isotopic speleothem dating. This paper integrates emerging research and empirical observations to argue that many speleothem-based paleoclimate reconstructions may rest on compromised stratigraphic and isotopic frameworks.

Introduction

Caves are considered ideal archives of paleoclimate by some due to their stable environments and alleged ability to preserve mineral deposits over millennia. Speleothem such as stalagmites and flowstone are believed to provide high-resolution records of isotopic data, trace elements and growth dynamics, offering insights into past temperature, rainfall and vegetation regimes. Yet, the oversimplified treatment of cave systems as closed, thermally inert and continuously epigenic environments has overlooked the complexities introduced by airflow dynamics, subsurface radionuclide activity, microbial speleogenesis and primarily hypogenic speleogenesis.

Immediate Cave Climatology: Real-Time Dynamics

Immediate cave climatology refers to the short-term microclimatic conditions that regulate cave atmosphere, chemistry, and morphology. These dynamics unfold on daily to seasonal timescales and profoundly influence speleothem growth, gas exchange, and microbial ecology.

a) Temperature Regulation

Caves maintain thermal equilibrium close to the regional mean annual surface temperature. In Gauteng, South Africa, for example, caves remain around 17°C year-round, rarely fluctuating more than ±1°C. This is due to the thermal inertia of surrounding rock and limited direct surface exposure (Gregorič et al., 2013).

b) Diurnal Ventilation

Ventilation cycles occur when external ambient temperatures differ from the cave's mean. Cooler night air flows inward ("breathing in"), while warmer daytime air pushes internal air outward ("breathing out") (Sánchez-Cañete et al., 2013). This daily breathing facilitates CO₂, radon, and moisture exchange without significantly altering cave temperature.

c) Humidity and Particulate Deposition

Humidity in caves typically approaches saturation (95–100%), with minimal fluctuation. Small temperature shifts can trigger condensation-evaporation cycles, influencing:

  • Speleothem dissolution or precipitation.
  • Wall and ceiling corrosion features.
  • Biological activity, especially fungal and microbial communities.

Organic particulates (e.g., hair, lint, skin) from tourists accumulate and influence condensation nuclei formation, subtly modifying speleothem growth conditions in high-traffic areas.

d) Human Influence on Cave Microclimate

Tourist caves undergo thermal, chemical, and physical modification. Visitors introduce CO₂, metabolic heat and organic aerosols, which can increase cave-air CO₂ concentrations and reduce the gradient driving CO₂ degassing from water and soils. Foot-traffic–induced substrate compaction alters airflow and water infiltration, inhibiting speleothem growth and causing localised ecological degradation or relict conditions. Compaction and disturbance reduce soil porosity and displace or destroy microbial and invertebrate communities that contribute to local biogeochemical fluxes and small-scale heat production. Although biological heat production is minor relative to visitor metabolic heat and external thermal inputs, loss of these communities can measurably alter microclimate, gas fluxes, and nutrient cycling in affected zones. The magnitude and persistence of these effects depend on cave geometry, ventilation regime, visitor numbers, timing and hydrological connectivity.

e) Barometric Pressure and Radon Interplay

Radon (²²²Rn) concentrations respond to pressure changes and airflow rates. During stable atmospheric conditions, radon accumulates; during ventilation events, it is flushed dependant on luminal flow volumes. Elevated temperatures accelerate radon emanation from host rock, increasing ionizing radiation and influencing microbial populations including mineral dissolution (Šrámek et al., 2015).

These real-time processes define the cave's living climate and challenge the perception of subterranean environments as static.

 3. Impact of Ventilation on Speleothem Growth

Ventilation modulates CO₂ levels within the cave atmosphere, which directly affects the degassing of drip water and subsequent calcite/aragonite precipitation. High ventilation (typically in winter) lowers cave air CO₂, increasing degassing and speleothem growth. Conversely, low ventilation (summer) conditions reduce degassing potential (de Freitas and Littlejohn, 1987).

Furthermore, high visitor activity introduces additional CO₂ and particulate matter such as hair, skin cells or sloughing and lint. These organic and inorganic particulates function as nucleation substrates for speleothem growth, particularly in tourist caves. Over time, this can sterilise active formations, converting them into relict speleothems by compacting substrate layers and elevating CO₂ beyond saturation thresholds.

4. Radionuclides and Cave Speleogenesis

Radon (²²²Rn) levels in caves fluctuate with temperature, pressure, and airflow. In Seongryu Cave, Korea, night-time accumulation and daytime flushing of radon provide clear evidence of diurnal ventilation (Oh & Kim, 2011). Temperature indirectly affects radon emanation by influencing diffusion and airflow efficiency. The hotter the cave, the more radon is released due to accelerated emanation rates and increased decay kinetics.

Radionuclides contribute to speleogenesis via several pathways:

  • Alpha recoil: Damage from alpha decay of U-series isotopes increases rock susceptibility to dissolution.
  • Radiolysis: Decay-induced splitting of water molecules produces reactive radicals (OH•, H•) {hydroxyl radical & hydrogen radical} that enhance chemical weathering.
  • Microbial mediation: Radionuclide-rich environments foster chemo lithotrophic microbial communities that catalyse rock dissolution (Šrámek et al., 2015).

These mechanisms introduce non-climatic drivers of speleothem development, particularly in confined karst systems with limited ventilation. Radon and its daughters of decay contribute to long-term chemical instability, creating isotopic noise that can mask or mimic environmental signals.

5. Hypogenic Overprinting and Isotopic Clock Reset

Hypogenic speleogenesis involves the action of ascending fluids, often enriched in CO₂ or H₂S, which can intrude vadose cave systems and trigger episodes of rapid mineral precipitation successively. A single hypogenic event, occurring on centennial to millennial scales, may deposit massive quantities of calcite, overprinting or super saturating pre-existing speleothem layers and obscuring fine-scale isotopic signals (δ¹⁸O, δ¹³C). This process compromises the apparent continuity of laminar growth and risks misleading paleoclimate interpretations if not detected through petrographic or geochemical screening (Klimchouk, 2007; Palmer, 2007).

Such events may also induce open-system behavior in uranium-series isotopes, leading to partial or complete resetting of U-Th isotopic systems. This undermines one of the primary chronological tools used in speleothem research (Edwards et al., 1987; Dorale & Liu, 2009). Consequently, speleothem subjected to hypogenic overprinting may yield chronologies that appear precise but are in fact compromised, masking or homogenising environmental signals. Without careful petrographic and geochemical assessment, these archives risk being misinterpreted as continuous records of climatic change when they are instead overprinted by non-climatic events.

In such cases, the appearance of continuous laminar growth may be deceptive. Without petrographic or trace-element screening, researchers risk interpreting homogenised, event-driven speleothem as representative climate records (Klimchouk, 2007; Palmer, 2007; Dorale & Liu, 2009). More critically, the assumption of isotopic continuity fails in hypogenic contexts. Supersaturation over even a short span (e.g., one hundred years) can obliterate the resolution of δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C records and flatten trace element variability. In doing so, the speleothem becomes a homogenised, non-climatic archive. These overprints could reset uranium-series ages, rendering the chronological framework speculative.

6. Implications for Paleoclimate Reconstructions

Speleothem archives have underpinned thousands of paleoclimate studies, yet many are built on assumptions now challenged by these findings:

  • Continuity: Interrupted by hypogenic pulses.
  • Closed-system isotopic behaviour: Disrupted by radionuclide flux and recrystallization.
  • Chronology: Obscured by uranium-series mobility and laminae overprinting.
  • Microclimatic stability: Oversimplified in systems with active diurnal ventilation.

Future studies must incorporate ventilation monitoring, radionuclide profiling, and hypogenic event detection to validate datasets. Without this, reconstructions may reflect post-genetic chemical noise rather than genuine climatic shifts.

7. Conclusion

This paper highlights the need for a change in basic assumptions in cave climatology and speleothem interpretation. By acknowledging the roles of hypogenic overprinting, diurnal ventilation, and radionuclide-induced speleogenesis, researchers can more accurately reconstruct paleoenvironments and identify cave systems unsuitable for paleoclimatic analysis.

References

Choi, D.-W., Kim, Y., & Woo, K.S., 2013. Seasonal and diurnal variations of radon concentration in Seongryu Cave, Korea. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 115, pp.73–80.

Cigna, A.A., 2005. Radon in caves. International Journal of Speleology, 34(1–2), pp.1–18.

de Freitas, C.R. and Littlejohn, R.N., 1987. Cave climate: Assessment of heat and moisture exchange. Journal of Climatology, 7(6), pp.553–569.

Dorale, J.A. & Liu, Z., 2009. Limitations of Uranium-Thorium dating of speleothems: Open-system behavior and isotopic resetting. Quaternary Science Reviews, 28(15–16), pp.1505–1522.

Edwards, R.L., Chen, J.H. & Wasserburg, G.J., 1987. 238U–234U–230Th–232Th systematics and the precise measurement of time over the past 500,000 years. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 81(2–3), pp.175–192.

Garagnon, J., Siffert, D., Valla, P.G. and Mattielli, N., 2023. Ventilation regime in Milandre Cave (Switzerland): Impact on CO₂ and microclimate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12819.

Gregorič, A., Vaupotič, J., Šebela, S. and Stanič, S., 2013. The role of cave ventilation in governing cave temperature and radon levels (Postojna Cave, Slovenia). International Journal of Climatology, 33(6), pp.1538–1548.

Klimchouk, A., 2007. Hypogene Speleogenesis: Hydrogeological and Morphogenetic Perspective. National Cave and Karst Research Institute, Special Paper 1.

Palmer, A.N., 2007. Cave Geology. Cave Books.

Sánchez-Cañete, E.P., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Kowalski, A.S. and Domingo, F., 2013. Cave ventilation is influenced by CO₂-dependent virtual temperature. International Journal of Speleology, 42(1), pp.1–8.

Oh, Y.H., Kim, G. Factors controlling the air ventilation of a limestone cave revealed by 222Rn and 220Rn tracers. Geosci J 15, 115–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-011-0010-3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog