The Impact of
Human Activity on Cave Ecosystems - Mike Buchanan 2022
Opening Salvo
Carbonate cave systems and associated karst landscapes host complex, interdependent biological communities, microbes, fungi, protists, invertebrates and vertebrate-associated microbiomes. That have co‑evolved with the physical and chemical gradients of the subterranean environment; naturally occurring pathogens are therefore not anomalous intruders but intrinsic members of this biome, playing roles in nutrient cycling, population regulation and ecological resilience while reflecting the cave’s hydrology, substrate chemistry, and biological connectivity to surface ecosystems. Human activities, surface land use change, groundwater contamination, cave tourism, mining and introduction of non-native organisms, alter these delicately balanced conditions. Shifting microbial community composition and sometimes increasing the abundance or distribution of opportunistic or zoonotic agents, which raises occupational and public‑health considerations without transforming caves into static “hazmat” zones; instead, evidence supports a risk‑management approach grounded in monitoring, source‑control of contaminants, training and protective practices for cave users and conservation of karst catchments to preserve the ecological functions that both sustain endemic life and naturally regulate pathogen dynamics.
“In the hush beneath the earth, where stone remembers
water's first journeys, life persists in quiet economies, unseen, interwoven
and neither benign nor malevolent, but simply doing what living systems do:
adapt, exchange and endure.”
Abstract
Caves are unique ecosystems that host a diverse array of
microorganisms and species, many of which are sensitive to environmental
changes. This white paper discusses the risks associated with human activity in
caves, particularly the transfer of pathogens, the introduction of non-native
species, and the environmental impact of caving gear. It emphasizes the need
for responsible caving practices to protect these fragile ecosystems.
Introduction
Caves serve as natural incubators, providing high humidity,
constant temperatures, and elevated carbon dioxide levels that create ideal
conditions for microbial growth. However, human visitation can introduce
pathogens and disrupt the delicate balance of cave ecosystems. This paper
explores the mechanisms of pathogen transfer, the implications of non-native
species, and the environmental impact of caving gear.
Human Impact on Cave Ecosystems
Endemic Biological Communities
Humans carry their own unique microbial communities, which
can alter cave ecosystems upon entry. The notion that humans become
contaminants after their first visit underscores the need for stringent access
protocols to protect cave environments.
Recommendations for Cavers
- Limit
Visits: Reduce the frequency of trips to sensitive caves to allow
ecosystems to recover.
- Use
Minimal Gear: Consider using gear that minimizes the risk of
contamination and microplastic shedding.
- Educate
and Advocate: Promote awareness among cavers about the ecological
impacts of their activities and the importance of protecting cave
environments.
Pathogens and Transfer Mechanisms
Sporotrichosis and Wood Products
Sporothrix schenckii, the causative agent of sporotrichosis,
can latch onto dry wood products, posing a risk when these materials are
transported into caves. The introduction of non-native organisms can disrupt
the delicate balance of cave ecosystems, potentially leading to the extinction
of native biofilms and other microorganisms (Sigler and Kauffman, 2013).
Virus Pathogens
Haemorrhagic fever Viruses
Both Marburg and Ebola viruses have equatorial origins and
are linked to caves due to their association with bat populations that serve as
natural reservoirs. The Marburg virus was first identified in 1967, with
significant occurrences in Kitum Cave in Kenya, where humans contracted the
virus after contact with infected fruit bats. Similarly, the Ebola virus, first
identified in 1976 near the Ebola River in the Democratic Republic of Congo,
has been traced back to fruit bats, with outbreaks often occurring in regions
near caves or forests where these bats roost. Both viruses highlight the
importance of monitoring wildlife habitats in equatorial regions to prevent
zoonotic spillover events that can lead to human outbreaks. While the
association of Ebola and Marburg viruses with caves primarily stems from the
presence of certain bat species, it is important to note that not all fruit
bats roost in caves. The connection to caves is more pronounced for specific
bat species that may inhabit these environments (WHO, 2020).
Coronaviruses
Coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2,
can have serious implications for both wildlife and human health. Many
coronaviruses are found in bat populations, which often inhabit caves. When
humans enter caves, they may come into contact with bat droppings or
respiratory secretions, increasing the risk of zoonotic transmission. Caves can
function as incubators for these pathogens, allowing them to thrive and
proliferate (Wu et al., 2020).
Hantaviruses
Hantaviruses are a group of viruses carried by rodents,
which cause both Haemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome (HFRS) and Hantavirus
Cardiopulmonary Syndrome (HCPS), are primarily carried by rodents, people
become infected by inhaling the virus from rodent droppings, urine, or
saliva. Therefore, these diseases can be found in environments where
infected rodents live, including caves, though direct evidence of cave
transmission is not explicitly highlighted, it is a potential site for exposure
to rodent habitats. Cavers and researchers who enter caves with rodent
populations are at risk of hantavirus exposure, which can lead to severe
respiratory distress and fever (Hjelle and Glass, 2000).
Bacterial Pathogens
- Brucella
spp.: These bacteria can cause brucellosis, a zoonotic disease affecting
various mammals, including humans. The introduction of Brucella into cave
environments can disrupt local wildlife populations and potentially affect
human health (Pappas et al., 2006).
- Mycobacterium
tuberculosis: This bacterium can survive in various environments,
including caves, posing a risk to both cave-dwelling species and humans
(World Health Organization, 2020).
- Leptospira
spp.: These bacteria cause leptospirosis, which can be transmitted through
contaminated water or soil. Leptospira can thrive in moist cave
environments, potentially affecting both wildlife and humans (Levett,
2001).
Fungal Pathogens
Histoplasma capsulatum
- Histoplasma capsulatum is
a dimorphic pathogenic fungus that transforms into yeast after crossing
the alveolar membrane in humans and can adhere to caving gear and human
skin due to its sticky outer casing. This characteristic makes it
particularly challenging to eliminate, leading to concerns about
cross-contamination when gear is transferred between caves. The
persistence of this pathogen on surfaces necessitates strict protocols to
avoid introducing it into new environments (Kauffman, 2007).
- Batrachochytrium
dendrobatidis (Bd): This chytrid fungus is responsible for
chytridiomycosis, a disease that has devastated amphibian populations
worldwide. If introduced into caves, Bd can spread to amphibians that
inhabit these environments, leading to population declines (Berger, Speare
and Daszak, 1998).
- Aspergillus
spp.: Some species of Aspergillus can produce mycotoxins and cause
respiratory issues in humans and animals. The introduction of these fungi
can affect both cave-dwelling species and cavers, particularly those with
compromised immune systems (Culver and Pipan, 2009).
- White-Nose
Syndrome (WNS) (Frick, Pollock and Hicks, 2010).
WNS is caused by the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans,
which infects hibernating bats, leading to significant mortality rates.
Infected bats exhibit abnormal behaviours, such as waking frequently during
hibernation, which depletes their fat reserves and ultimately leads to
starvation. WNS has led to dramatic declines in bat populations across North
America, disrupting the ecological balance, as bats play crucial roles in
insect control and pollination. While WNS primarily affects bats, humans can
inadvertently spread the fungus through contaminated gear and clothing (Lorch
et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2014).
Protozoan Pathogens
- Giardia
lamblia: This protozoan parasite causes giardiasis, a gastrointestinal
illness. If introduced into cave water sources, Giardia can affect both
wildlife and humans who come into contact with contaminated water (Culver
and Pipan, 2009).
- Cryptosporidium
spp.: Similar to Giardia, Cryptosporidium can cause gastrointestinal
illness, posing health risks to both animals and humans (Culver and Pipan,
2009).
Cleaning Limitations
Despite advances in decontamination, cleaning cave equipment
is constrained by both material durability and pathogen resilience. Some fungi,
such as Pseudogymnoascus destructans (the causative agent of White-Nose
Syndrome), can persist on porous fabrics even after multiple washes (Lorch et
al., 2013). Additionally, chemical disinfectants may degrade ropes and
harnesses, limiting their long-term effectiveness (Johnson et al., 2014).
Complete sterilisation is rarely feasible in field conditions, leaving a residual
risk of cross-contamination between cave sites (Frick, Pollock and Hicks, 2010)
(Lorch et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2014) (US Fish and Wildlife Service,
2016).
Routine washing of caving attire and equipment.
Routine cleaning protocols are essential to minimise
pathogen transfer between caves. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recommends
soaking gear in 10% bleach or commercial disinfectants (USFWS, 2016). For
non-immersible gear, UV light treatment has been shown to reduce fungal
viability (Palmer et al., 2018). Importantly, consistent decontamination after
every cave visit should become standard practice, supported by caving
organisations through training and awareness campaigns (Culver and Pipan,
2009). Integrating routine washing into caving culture not only protects
wildlife but also reduces zoonotic risks to humans.
References
·
Kauffman, C. A. (2007). Histoplasmosis: A Review
for Clinicians. The American Journal of Medicine, 120(4),
301-307. Link
·
Sigler, L., & Kauffman, C. A. (2013).
Sporotrichosis: A Review. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 26(2),
217-227. Link
·
Wu, F., Zhao, S., Yu, B., et al. (2020). A new
coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature,
579(7798), 265-269. Link
·
Pappas, G., Papadimitriou, P., Akritidis, N., et
al. (2006). The role of animal husbandry in the epidemiology of
brucellosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 19(3), 328-356. Link
·
World Health Organization. (2020). Global
Tuberculosis Report 2020. Link
·
Levett, P. N. (2001). Leptospirosis. Clinical
Microbiology Reviews, 14(2), 296-326. Link
·
Berger, L., Speare, R., & Daszak, P. (1998).
Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines
in the rainforests of Australia and Central America. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 95(15), 9031-9036. Link
·
Hjelle, B., & Glass, G. E. (2000).
Hantavirus in the Americas and its emergence as a zoonotic pathogen. Clinical
Microbiology Reviews, 13(3), 440-453. Link
·
Frick, W. F., Pollock, J. F., & Hicks, A. C.
(2010). An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common
North American bat species. Science, 329(5992), 679-682. Link
·
Culver, D. C., & Pipan, T. (2009). The
Biology of Caves and Other Subterranean Habitats. Oxford University
Press. Link
Comments