Against the
Sacrifice of Stone: Why the World Must Halt Urban Development of Karst Systems
– Mike Buchanan 2025
Humanity has always lived in dialogue with stone. From the
cave shelters of our earliest ancestors to the water-bearing aquifers that
nourish our cities, carbonate landscapes, karst systems, have provided
sanctuary, sustenance and spiritual depth. To destroy them in the name of
short-term “development” is not only an ecological tragedy, but also an act of
profound cultural amnesia and spiritual blindness.
The Ancient Covenant: Karst as Home of Ancestors and Myth
A Habitat Without Equal
Karst systems are not barren rock but vast four-dimensional
interconnected habitats, above, below and within. They are refugia for species
found nowhere else on Earth. Subterranean rivers, blind fish, invertebrates
adapted to eternal darkness, bats whose guano fertilises forests, and ancient
microbiomes that stabilise climate cycles, all are woven into karst’s fragile
web. Endemism in karst is so profound that to lose one cave is often to
extinguish an entire branch of life’s tree.
The Climatic and Hydrologic Lifeline
Healthy karst acts as the lungs and veins of landscapes.
Rainfall infiltrates through porous limestone, dolomite and chalks, recharging
aquifers from above and below (Hypogenic & epigenic processes), buffering
floods, sustaining springs and sequestering carbon. But when we pave, quarry,
or build upon karst catchments, we suffocate the stone, its biologic services.
Impermeable surfaces deny infiltration, deliver contaminants and create
diversionary channels which amplify catastrophic flooding and groundwater
drawdown destabilises the land itself. The result: sinkholes, subsidence,
desertification and geologic collapse. The Nullarbor, the Sahara, even the
American Midwest whisper warnings of this fate.
The Toxic Legacy of Development
Urbanisation of karst systems is not only an ecological
crime, but also a toxic gamble. Quarrying and excavation unearth radionuclides
locked away for millennia, releasing carcinogens into air and water. Concrete
poured atop karst carries the double burden of climate cost and permanent
hydrological damage. We should be reusing the concrete of demolished cities,
off karst systems only, not desecrating new quarries across landscapes already
stretched to breaking point.
Desertification and the Vanishing of Eden
Every karst system destroyed is a step toward
desertification, a drying of soil, spirit, and civilization. ALL Karst Systems
are Earth’s hidden Eden’s, quietly maintaining fertility and balance. When
these systems collapse, rivers run dry, forests vanish and the land becomes
sterile. The loss is not just ecological, but psychological: a world stripped
of mystery, where humanity severs itself from the sacred spaces that once gave
birth to awe including all life on Earth.
Reversal, Not Expansion
We must not merely halt further development of karst catchments;
we must reverse the damage already done. Rehabilitation programs must be
enacted where “foolish developments” have occurred. Contaminated sites must be
remediated. Hydrological pathways must be restored. Former quarries must be
reclaimed as sanctuaries, not scars.
Nullarbor: A World Heritage Site Under Siege
The Nullarbor Plain, the world’s largest arid limestone
karst system, stands as a symbol of this struggle. Its caves harbour ecosystems
found nowhere else, its geomorphology testifies to Earth’s creative forces and
its vastness inspires awe. To damage it in the name of “clean energy” or
“growth” is to trade one crisis for another, blind to the deeper cost. As cave
ecologist Stefan Eberhard reminds us, “These caves are not isolated holes in
the ground, they are part of an integrated subterranean drainage system.”
Damage one chamber, and you damage the whole cathedral.
Choosing Wisdom Over Naïveté
Our ancestors once understood reverence for stone and water.
Today, in our naiveté, we pierce, pave, and poison the very structures that
make life possible. The karst beneath our feet is not dead rock but a breathing.
living organism, a cathedral, and a covenant. To destroy it, is to destroy
ourselves.
We must reclaim humility. We must recognise that development
on karst is not progress but regression stat, an inevitable descent into
desertification, collapse and a radioactive legacy. We must choose restoration
over extraction, protection over plunder, reverence over ignorance.
The Garden of Eden is not lost. It still breathes in host
karst systems, the caves, the aquifers, the subterranean rivers. But if we
continue down this path of violence, ignorance and aggression against karst systems,
we will awaken one day to find Eden gone, not by divine decree, but by our own
hand.
Karst (carbonate) landscapes host globally significant
hydrological, ecological, climatic, cultural, and geological systems. Urban
development upon karst terrains threatens their integrity, leading to loss of
endemic biodiversity, groundwater degradation, exacerbated desertification,
landscape collapse (sinkholes), disruption of climate‐buffering
functions and even radiological hazards via disturbance of buried
radionuclides. This paper argues that any urban expansion or development into
karst catchments should be halted; where previous development has occurred,
active reversal and rehabilitation must be mandated. Drawing on global karst
science, geoheritage values and mythic-cultural symbolism (Eden, Babylon), this
document seeks to reframe carbonate terrains not as expendable substrate but as
sacred, living systems integral to all life, terrestrial and subterranean and interconnected
ancestral heritage.
Introduction
Karst terrains, composed primarily of soluble carbonate rock
such as limestone, dolomite and chalks are distinguished by high permeability,
underground conduits, caves, sinkholes, and subterranean drainage. They
underlie approximately 20 % of Earth’s land surface, and supply around 25 % of
the world’s drinking water via karst aquifers (Ford & Williams, cited in
UNESCO document) (UN 2015)
Karst systems harbour unique and highly endemic ecosystems (Fauna & Flora,
2021) and preserve paleoenvironmental archives in speleothems and cave
sediments (UN 2015). Because karst hydrology is strongly coupled between
surface and subsurface, urban development that ignores this connectivity
invariably causes collapse of ecological and hydrological resilience.
While many proponents of development invoke economic growth,
renewable energy, housing need, and infrastructure, few fully confront the
existential risks faced by karst systems. This paper asserts that halting and
reversing urbanisation in karst catchments is both scientifically imperative
and morally justified.
The Ecological and Biodiversity Imperative
- Subterranean
Endemism & Habitat Interconnection
Karst systems, its caves and aquifers are not isolated holes in the ground but integrated ecological networks. Many cave‐dwelling species (blind fish, stygobionts, troglobitic invertebrates, subterranean microbes) exist nowhere else on Earth (Fauna & Flora, 2021). Surface–subsurface coupling means surface disturbances propagate downward, degrading habitat connectivity and driving extinctions. - Aboveground–Belowground
Coupling
Karst springs, resurgence rivers, and associated vegetation are intimately linked to subterranean recharge. Karst streams often facilitate temperature and soil moisture moderation, buffer acidic inputs (via carbonate leaching) and enhance aquatic productivity (BC Government, 2024).
If one severs the recharge or interrupts hyporheic zone connectivity, riparian ecosystems, wetlands and groundwater‐dependent vegetation suffer decline. - Geoheritage,
Paleoarchives, and Cultural Depth
Caves preserve speleothems, sediments, fossils, and paleoclimate records essential to our understanding of Earth’s past. They are part of cultural patrimony: many human cultures have invoked caves in origin myths, rituals and ancestral memory. Destroying karst is erasing the memory of Earth and human lineage.
Hydrology, Climate, and Landscape Stability
- Recharge,
Flood Mitigation, and Flow Regulation
Because karst conduits allow rapid infiltration, these landscapes help buffer floods by absorbing high rainfall and sustain baseflows in dry periods. The storage and conveyance capacity of karst moderates’ seasonality (UN 2015).
Paving, impermeable surfaces, urbanisation, drainage channels and diversion reduce infiltration, increase surface runoff and exacerbate flood peaks and erosion. - Carbon
Sink & Buffering
Karst dissolution and carbonate precipitation (e.g., in speleothems) function as a CO₂ sink over geological timescales. Protecting karst thus contributes to carbon cycling and climate regulation (Boell, 2021). - Collapse,
Sinkholes, and Structural Risk
Groundwater drawdown, heavy loading from construction, or excavation destabilises karst roofs and surfaces, inducing sinkholes and land subsidence. Thus, development over karst entails persistent costly geotechnical risk. USGS notes that karst landforms “can rapidly alter the land surface … from a nuisance to an actual hazard” (USGS, n.d.)
Radiological and Contaminant Risks
- Disturbance
of Buried Radionuclides
Though carbonate rocks are typically low in radionuclide content, the overlying sediments often have greater concentrations. In “covered karst,” excavation and erosion may release radionuclides (e.g. ²³²Th, ⁴⁰K, ²³⁸U) and elevate gamma‐dose rates (Trájer et al. 2020).
Moreover, quarrying in carbonate terrains can mobilize naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) in building materials or waste, with potential health impacts (Oladejo et al. 2025). - Rapid
Transport of Pollutants
Contaminants on the surface (chemical spills, wastewater, heavy metals, nutrients) can rapidly bypass soil filtration and travel through karst conduits into aquifers (Ren et al. 2023). The heterogeneity of karst makes contaminant tracking difficult, increasing risk (Ren et al. 2023).
Development often introduces point‐sources that overwhelm karst’s capacity to buffer, leading to groundwater degradation.
Moral, Cultural & Mythic Framing
To view karst as “waste rock” or “development opportunity”
is to adopt an anthropocentric hubris akin to Babylon’s tower. In numerous
mythologies, caves are portals to underworlds, wombs of creation, or sacred
spaces. The Garden of Eden myth places flowing waters as primal to sacredness;
to sever subterranean flows is a symbolic disinheritance of cosmic life.
This moral framing is not mere rhetoric; it can ground
public will. If we see carbonate systems not as “substrate to exploit” but as
ancestral cathedrals of stone, we shift the burden of proof: no development may
proceed unless it honours the integrity of the system.
Case Example: The Nullarbor Threat
The Nullarbor Plain is the world’s largest arid limestone
karst system and is under active threat of large infrastructure and energy
projects (Reed et al., quoted). Scientists caution that its caves form an
“integrated subterranean drainage system” that cannot simply accommodate
overlay development (Eberhard, quoted).
This example amplifies the general principle: where development meets karst,
cumulative risk of hydrologic, ecological and geotechnical collapse is high.
Recommendations & Programmatic Strategy
- Moratoria
& Exclusion Zones
Enact global and national moratoria on urban expansion in karst catchments. Establish legal protection zones around all key karst systems and interconnected recharge areas. - Rehabilitation
& Reversal
On sites where development has already compromised karst systems, mandate remediation: removal of impervious surfaces, reintroduction of permeability, regrading, cave and karst feature restoration, contaminant removal, hydrologic reconnection. - Reuse
& Circular Economy
Rather than opening new quarries on karst terrains, prioritize reuse, recycling and upcycling of demolished concrete and masonry from non-karst zones. - Cumulative
Risk Assessment & Monitoring
Require developers to conduct karst‐aware impact assessments, utilising tracer testing, gamma radiation surveys, hydrologic modelling and geotechnical stability analyses. - World
Heritage & Geoheritage Listings
Pursue UNESCO Natural World Heritage or national geoheritage designations for all critical karst terrains not only Cultural Heritage (e.g. South Africa-CHKWHS, Nullarbor, Škocjan Caves). These formal protections can raise the legal threshold for development. - Public
Education & Cultural Narrative
Educate societies about the sacred, ancestral and ecological value of karst. Integrate mythic, aesthetic and local narratives to build public resistance to destructive development.
Conclusion
Karst systems are not inert substrata awaiting conversion;
they are dynamic, living, integrally interconnected systems supporting life,
memory, climate and stability. Urban development on carbonate terrains carries
deeply interwoven risks: endemic extinctions, groundwater collapse, flooding,
radiological release, land subsidence and cultural loss including
desertification.
The precautionary principle demands that we not only cease
development in karst regions but actively restore damaged systems. In doing so,
we affirm our responsibility to our ancestors, to future generations and to the
subterranean life that dwells beyond sight.
Failing to protect karst is not progress - it is a slow
descent into desertification and forgetfulness.
References
Boell, S. (2021) Why We Should Protect Karst Landscapes.
Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Available at:
https://th.boell.org/en/2021/03/03/why-we-should-protect-karst-landscapes.
Fauna & Flora (2021) What is karst, and why should we
care about it? Available at:
https://www.fauna-flora.org/news/what-is-karst-and-why-should-we-care-about-it/.
Culver, D. C. & Pipan, T. (2019) The Biology of Caves
and Other Subterranean Habitats. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eberhard, S. (2023) quoted in: The Australian.
“Greens leader backs ‘destructive’ renewables”, 23 September.
Fairchild, I. & Baker, A. (2012) Speleothem Science:
From Process to Past Environments. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ford, D. & Williams, P. (2007) Karst Hydrogeology and
Geomorphology. Chichester: Wiley.
Kunz, T. H., de Torrez, E. B., Bauer, D., Lobova, T. &
Fleming, T. H. (2011) ‘Ecosystem services provided by bats’, Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences, 1223(1), pp. 1–38.
Oladejo, O. F., et al. (2025) ‘Assessment of radiation
hazards from natural radionuclide materials in quarry products and surrounding
soils’, Scientific Reports. [Online ahead of print].
Ren, K., et al. (2023) ‘Tracking contaminants in groundwater
flowing across a karst aquifer’, Journal of Hydrology, 618, 129154.
Reed, L. (2023) Public commentary on Nullarbor threats.
Quoted in: The Weekend Australian. 23 September.
Trájer, A. J., et al. (2020) ‘Investigation of the
vulnerability of a partly covered karst: radionuclide and gamma-dose
measurements’, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(3), pp.
3304–3316.
UNESCO (2015) Scientific and socio-economic importance of
karst and caves and their vulnerability. Paris: UNESCO.
USGS (n.d.) ‘Karst Aquifers’, U.S. Geological Survey.
Available at:
https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/water-resources/science/karst-aquifers
(Accessed 3 October 2025).
Comments