Against the Sacrifice of Stone: Why the World Must Halt Urban Development of Karst Systems – Mike Buchanan 2025

Humanity has always lived in dialogue with stone. From the cave shelters of our earliest ancestors to the water-bearing aquifers that nourish our cities, carbonate landscapes, karst systems, have provided sanctuary, sustenance and spiritual depth. To destroy them in the name of short-term “development” is not only an ecological tragedy, but also an act of profound cultural amnesia and spiritual blindness.

The Ancient Covenant: Karst as Home of Ancestors and Myth

Caves have been the womb of our species’ imagination. They sheltered the first fires, held the paintings of Chauvet and Lascaux and gave rise to myths of the underworld, Eden and other paradises lost. To step into a cave or its host karst system is to step back into the memory of Earth itself. Karst landscapes are not merely stone; they are the living archive of all who have come before us. In the mythical Garden of Eden, water flowed clear and abundant; in Babylon, we see the price of hubris against nature. As we desertify our world through greed and ignorance, we replay that fall from grace.

A Habitat Without Equal

Karst systems are not barren rock but vast four-dimensional interconnected habitats, above, below and within. They are refugia for species found nowhere else on Earth. Subterranean rivers, blind fish, invertebrates adapted to eternal darkness, bats whose guano fertilises forests, and ancient microbiomes that stabilise climate cycles, all are woven into karst’s fragile web. Endemism in karst is so profound that to lose one cave is often to extinguish an entire branch of life’s tree.

The Climatic and Hydrologic Lifeline

Healthy karst acts as the lungs and veins of landscapes. Rainfall infiltrates through porous limestone, dolomite and chalks, recharging aquifers from above and below (Hypogenic & epigenic processes), buffering floods, sustaining springs and sequestering carbon. But when we pave, quarry, or build upon karst catchments, we suffocate the stone, its biologic services. Impermeable surfaces deny infiltration, deliver contaminants and create diversionary channels which amplify catastrophic flooding and groundwater drawdown destabilises the land itself. The result: sinkholes, subsidence, desertification and geologic collapse. The Nullarbor, the Sahara, even the American Midwest whisper warnings of this fate.

The Toxic Legacy of Development

Urbanisation of karst systems is not only an ecological crime, but also a toxic gamble. Quarrying and excavation unearth radionuclides locked away for millennia, releasing carcinogens into air and water. Concrete poured atop karst carries the double burden of climate cost and permanent hydrological damage. We should be reusing the concrete of demolished cities, off karst systems only, not desecrating new quarries across landscapes already stretched to breaking point.

Desertification and the Vanishing of Eden

Every karst system destroyed is a step toward desertification, a drying of soil, spirit, and civilisation. ALL Karst Systems are Earth’s hidden Eden’s, quietly maintaining fertility and balance. When these systems collapse, rivers run dry, forests vanish and the land becomes sterile. The loss is not just ecological, but psychological: a world stripped of mystery, where humanity severs itself from the sacred spaces that once gave birth to awe including all life on Earth.

Reversal, Not Expansion

We must not merely halt further development of karst catchments; we must reverse the damage already done. Rehabilitation programs must be enacted where “foolish developments” have occurred. Contaminated sites must be remediated. Hydrological pathways must be restored. Former quarries must be reclaimed as sanctuaries, not scars.

Nullarbor: A World Heritage Site Under Siege

The Nullarbor Plain, the world’s largest arid limestone karst system, stands as a symbol of this struggle. Its caves harbour ecosystems found nowhere else, its geomorphology testifies to Earth’s creative forces and its vastness inspires awe. To damage it in the name of “clean energy” or “growth” is to trade one crisis for another, blind to the deeper cost. As cave ecologist Stefan Eberhard reminds us, “These caves are not isolated holes in the ground, they are part of an integrated subterranean drainage system.” Damage one chamber, and you damage the whole cathedral.

Choosing Wisdom Over Naïveté

Our ancestors once understood reverence for stone and water. Today, in our naiveté, we pierce, pave, and poison the very structures that make life possible. The karst beneath our feet is not dead rock but a breathing. living organism, a cathedral, and a covenant. To destroy it, is to destroy ourselves.

We must reclaim humility. We must recognise that development on karst is not progress but regression stat, an inevitable descent into desertification, collapse and a radioactive legacy. We must choose restoration over extraction, protection over plunder, reverence over ignorance.

The Garden of Eden is not lost. It still breathes in host karst systems, the caves, the aquifers, the subterranean rivers. But if we continue down this path of violence, ignorance and aggression against karst systems, we will awaken one day to find Eden gone, not by divine decree, but by our own hand.

 Abstract

Karst (carbonate) landscapes host globally significant hydrological, ecological, climatic, cultural and geological systems. Urban development upon karst terrains threatens their integrity, leading to loss of endemic biodiversity, groundwater degradation, exacerbated desertification, landscape collapse (sinkholes), disruption of climate‐buffering functions and even radiological hazards via disturbance of buried radionuclides. This paper argues that any urban expansion or development into karst catchments should be halted; where previous development has occurred, active reversal and rehabilitation must be mandated. Drawing on global karst science, geoheritage values and mythic-cultural symbolism (Eden, Babylon), this document seeks to reframe carbonate terrains not as expendable substrate but as sacred, living systems integral to all life, terrestrial and subterranean and interconnected ancestral heritage.

Introduction

Karst terrains, composed primarily of soluble carbonate rock such as limestone, dolomite and chalks are distinguished by high permeability, underground conduits, caves, sinkholes, and subterranean drainage. They underlie approximately 20 % of Earth’s land surface, and supply around 25 % of the world’s drinking water via karst aquifers (Ford & Williams, cited in UNESCO document) (UN 2015)
Karst systems harbour unique and highly endemic ecosystems (Fauna & Flora, 2021) and preserve paleoenvironmental archives in speleothem and cave sediments (UN 2015). Because karst hydrology is strongly coupled between surface and subsurface, urban development that ignores this connectivity invariably causes collapse of ecological and hydrological resilience.

While many proponents of development invoke economic growth, renewable energy, housing need, and infrastructure, few fully confront the existential risks faced by karst systems. This paper asserts that halting and reversing urbanisation in karst catchments is both scientifically imperative and morally justified.

The Ecological and Biodiversity Imperative

1. Subterranean Endemism & Habitat Interconnection
   Karst systems, its caves and aquifers are not isolated holes in the ground but integrated ecological networks. Many cave‐dwelling species (blind fish, stygobionts, troglobitic invertebrates, subterranean microbes) exist nowhere else on Earth (Fauna & Flora, 2021). Surface–subsurface coupling means surface disturbances propagate downward, degrading habitat connectivity and driving extinctions.
2. Aboveground–Belowground Coupling
   Karst springs, resurgence rivers, and associated vegetation are intimately linked to subterranean recharge. Karst streams often facilitate temperature and soil moisture moderation, buffer acidic inputs (via carbonate leaching) and enhance aquatic productivity (BC Government, 2024).
   If one severs the recharge or interrupts hyporheic zone connectivity, riparian ecosystems, wetlands and groundwater‐dependent vegetation suffer decline.
3. Geoheritage, Paleoarchives, and Cultural Depth
   Caves preserve speleothems, sediments, fossils, and paleoclimate records essential to our understanding of Earth’s past. They are part of cultural patrimony: many human cultures have invoked caves in origin myths, rituals and ancestral memory. Destroying karst is erasing the memory of Earth and human lineage.

Hydrology, Climate, and Landscape Stability

1. Recharge, Flood Mitigation, and Flow Regulation
   Because karst conduits allow rapid infiltration, these landscapes help buffer floods by absorbing high rainfall and sustain baseflows in dry periods. The storage and conveyance capacity of karst moderates’ seasonality (UN 2015).
   Paving, impermeable surfaces, urbanisation, drainage channels and diversion reduce infiltration, increase surface runoff and exacerbate flood peaks and erosion.
2. Carbon Sink & Buffering
   Karst dissolution and carbonate precipitation (e.g., in speleothems) function as a CO₂ sink over geological timescales. Protecting karst thus contributes to carbon cycling and climate regulation (Boell, 2021).
3. Collapse, Sinkholes, and Structural Risk
   Groundwater drawdown, heavy loading from construction, or excavation destabilises karst roofs and surfaces, inducing sinkholes and land subsidence. Thus, development over karst entails persistent costly geotechnical risk. USGS notes that karst landforms “can rapidly alter the land surface … from a nuisance to an actual hazard” (USGS, n.d.)

Radiological and Contaminant Risks

1. Disturbance of Buried Radionuclides
   Though carbonate rocks are typically low in radionuclide content, the overlying sediments often have greater concentrations. In “covered karst,” excavation and erosion may release radionuclides (e.g. ²³²Th, ⁴⁰K, ²³⁸U) and elevate gamma‐dose rates (Trájer et al. 2020).
   Moreover, quarrying in carbonate terrains can mobilise naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) in building materials or waste, with potential health impacts (Oladejo et al. 2025).
2. Rapid Transport of Pollutants
   Contaminants on the surface (chemical spills, wastewater, heavy metals, nutrients) can rapidly bypass soil filtration and travel through karst conduits into aquifers (Ren et al. 2023). The heterogeneity of karst makes contaminant tracking difficult, increasing risk (Ren et al. 2023).
   Development often introduces point‐sources that overwhelm karst’s capacity to buffer, leading to groundwater degradation.

Moral, Cultural & Mythic Framing

To view karst as “waste rock” or “development opportunity” is to adopt an anthropocentric hubris akin to Babylon’s tower. In numerous mythologies, caves are portals to underworlds, wombs of creation, or sacred spaces. The Garden of Eden myth places flowing waters as primal to sacredness; to sever subterranean flows is a symbolic disinheritance of cosmic life.

This moral framing is not mere rhetoric; it can ground public will. If we see carbonate systems not as “substrate to exploit” but as ancestral cathedrals of stone, we shift the burden of proof: no development may proceed unless it honours the integrity of the system.

Case Example: The Nullarbor Threat

The Nullarbor Plain is the world’s largest arid limestone karst system and is under active threat of large infrastructure and energy projects (Reed et al., quoted). Scientists caution that its caves form an “integrated subterranean drainage system” that cannot simply accommodate overlay development (Eberhard, quoted).
This example amplifies the general principle: where development meets karst, cumulative risk of hydrologic, ecological and geotechnical collapse is high.

Recommendations & Programmatic Strategy

1. Moratoria & Exclusion Zones
   Enact global and national moratoria on urban expansion in karst catchments. Establish legal protection zones around all key karst systems and interconnected recharge areas.
2. Rehabilitation & Reversal
   On sites where development has already compromised karst systems, mandate remediation: removal of impervious surfaces, reintroduction of permeability, regrading, cave and karst feature restoration, contaminant removal, hydrologic reconnection.
3. Reuse & Circular Economy
   Rather than opening new quarries on karst terrains, prioritise reuse, recycling and upcycling of demolished concrete and masonry from non-karst zones.
4. Cumulative Risk Assessment & Monitoring
   Require developers to conduct karst‐aware impact assessments, utilising tracer testing, gamma radiation surveys, hydrologic modelling and geotechnical stability analyses.
5. World Heritage & Geoheritage Listings
   Pursue UNESCO Natural World Heritage or national geoheritage designations for all critical karst terrains not only Cultural Heritage (e.g. South Africa-CHKWHS, Nullarbor, Škocjan Caves). These formal protections can raise the legal threshold for development.
6. Public Education & Cultural Narrative
   Educate societies about the sacred, ancestral and ecological value of karst. Integrate mythic, aesthetic and local narratives to build public resistance to destructive development.

Conclusion

Karst systems are not inert substrata awaiting conversion; they are dynamic, living, integrally interconnected systems supporting life, memory, climate and stability. Urban development on carbonate terrains carries deeply interwoven risks: endemic extinctions, groundwater collapse, flooding, radiological release, land subsidence and cultural loss including desertification.

The precautionary principle demands that we not only cease development in karst regions but actively restore damaged systems. In doing so, we affirm our responsibility to our ancestors, to future generations and to the subterranean life that dwells beyond sight.

Failing to protect karst is not progress - it is a slow descent into desertification and forgetfulness.

References

Boell, S. (2021) Why We Should Protect Karst Landscapes. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. Available at: https://th.boell.org/en/2021/03/03/why-we-should-protect-karst-landscapes.

Fauna & Flora (2021) What is karst, and why should we care about it? Available at: https://www.fauna-flora.org/news/what-is-karst-and-why-should-we-care-about-it/.

Culver, D. C. & Pipan, T. (2019) The Biology of Caves and Other Subterranean Habitats. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eberhard, S. (2023) quoted in: The Australian. “Greens leader backs ‘destructive’ renewables”, 23 September.

Fairchild, I. & Baker, A. (2012) Speleothem Science: From Process to Past Environments. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Ford, D. & Williams, P. (2007) Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology. Chichester: Wiley.

Kunz, T. H., de Torrez, E. B., Bauer, D., Lobova, T. & Fleming, T. H. (2011) ‘Ecosystem services provided by bats’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1223(1), pp. 1–38.

Oladejo, O. F., et al. (2025) ‘Assessment of radiation hazards from natural radionuclide materials in quarry products and surrounding soils’, Scientific Reports. [Online ahead of print].

Ren, K., et al. (2023) ‘Tracking contaminants in groundwater flowing across a karst aquifer’, Journal of Hydrology, 618, 129154.

Reed, L. (2023) Public commentary on Nullarbor threats. Quoted in: The Weekend Australian. 23 September.

Trájer, A. J., et al. (2020) ‘Investigation of the vulnerability of a partly covered karst: radionuclide and gamma-dose measurements’, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(3), pp. 3304–3316.

UNESCO (2015) Scientific and socio-economic importance of karst and caves and their vulnerability. Paris: UNESCO.

USGS (n.d.) ‘Karst Aquifers’, U.S. Geological Survey. Available at: https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/water-resources/science/karst-aquifers (Accessed 3 October 2025).