Environmental DNA
as a Hydrological Tracer: Expanding the Frontiers of Subterranean Ecology and
Hydrogeology
Mike Buchanan 2025
Abstract
1. Introduction
Hydrological tracers have long been fundamental tools in
groundwater research, used to reveal subsurface flow paths, residence times,
and aquifer connectivity. Conventional tracers, including fluorescent dyes,
salts, isotopes and gases, provide reliable measures of water movement but lack
ecological context (Smart and Laidlaw, 1977; Käss, 2004). In parallel,
environmental DNA (eDNA) has rapidly advanced ecological monitoring,
particularly for elusive or rare species (Taberlet et al., 2012; Deiner et al.,
2017). Recent work suggests that the transport of eDNA through groundwater and
cave systems can be exploited as a biologically informative tracer (Korbel et
al., 2024).
This convergence of molecular ecology and hydrogeology
represents a conceptual innovation: the use of DNA not only as a marker of
species presence but as a tracer of hydrological processes. The present paper
explores this intersection, critically reviewing current evidence, outlining
methodological pathways, and presenting a framework for future application.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Classical Hydrological Tracers
Dye tracing has been a cornerstone of karst hydrogeology for
over a century, providing clear signals of flow connectivity (Field, 2002).
Stable isotopes (δ^18O, δ^2H) and chemical tracers further refine assessments
of residence times and recharge sources (Kendall and McDonnell, 1998). While
effective, these tracers are purely physical or chemical, lacking biological
dimension.
Comparative Perspective: Bacterial Tracers vs. eDNA
Historical Use of Bacterial Tracers
- Coliforms
and Enterococci have been used as microbial indicators to trace
contamination pathways in groundwater, particularly in karst systems
(Harvey et al., 1989; Goldscheider et al., 2006).
- Deliberate
introduction of non-pathogenic bacterial strains (e.g., Bacillus
subtilis spores) has been used in tracer experiments to evaluate
subsurface flow and attenuation (Harvey et al., 1989).
- Bacteria
function as particulate tracers, transported differently from dissolved
dyes or salts, making them useful for studying colloid-facilitated
transport.
Advantages of Bacterial Tracers
- Detectable
at extremely low concentrations using culture or molecular methods.
- Provide
biological realism (actual organisms moving through aquifers).
- Some
are resilient (spores), allowing longer-term tracing.
Limitations of Bacterial Tracers
- Survival
and growth: Unlike inert tracers, bacteria may multiply or die off,
complicating interpretation.
- Public
health concerns: Even when using non-pathogenic strains, risk perception
and biosafety limit field applications.
- Variable
transport: Retention in porous media due to filtration, adsorption, or
biofilm interactions makes them less predictable than dyes or isotopes.
eDNA vs. Bacterial Tracers
- Safety:
eDNA introduces no living organisms into groundwater, avoiding
contamination concerns.
- Transport
dynamics: eDNA behaves more like a solute or colloid, showing
predictable decay curves, while bacteria interact biologically with the
environment.
- Information
content: Bacterial tracers provide information on particle transport;
eDNA carries ecological identity, linking hydrology with species presence.
Table 1. Comparative features of bacterial tracers and
eDNA as hydrological tracers
Aspect |
Bacterial Tracers |
eDNA Tracers |
Safety |
Potential biosafety concerns: even non-pathogenic strains
raise risk perception |
No living organisms introduced; minimal safety concerns |
Transport Dynamics |
Particulate transport; subject to filtration, adsorption,
biofilm interactions |
Behaves more like solute/colloid; predictable decay with
distance |
Detection |
Culture-based methods or molecular assays; moderate
sensitivity |
Sensitive qPCR or metabarcoding; species-level resolution |
Information Content |
Provides particle/colloid transport insights; limited
ecological identity |
Ecological identity (species presence) + hydrological
inference |
Limitations |
Survival, growth, die-off complicate interpretation;
regulatory hurdles |
Decay rate variability; signal may come from distant
sources |
Typical Applications |
Tracing contamination pathways; studying
colloid-facilitated transport |
Groundwater connectivity studies; linking hydrology and
ecology |
Integrative Potential
An interesting pathway is the combined study of microbial
DNA and eDNA. Microbial community DNA (16S rRNA metabarcoding) could be used
alongside macro-organism eDNA to study how microbes and macrofauna move through
aquifers together, providing a multi-scale bio-tracing approach.
2.2 Emergence of eDNA Tracing
Early eDNA studies established that genetic material could
persist and move through aquatic systems, raising questions about transport and
decay dynamics (Shogren et al., 2017). More recently, Carraro et al. (2018)
modelled species distributions in river networks using eDNA transport models,
demonstrating the potential for hydrological inferences. Korbel et al. (2024)
confirmed eDNA persistence in karst conduits, opening new avenues for
subsurface hydrology.
DNA persistence is mediated by degradation due to microbial
activity, enzymatic breakdown, UV exposure and hydrochemical conditions
(Collins et al., 2018). Transport can extend kilometres downstream, but signal
strength decays with distance and turbulence. These features align eDNA with
classical tracer decay curves but add ecological complexity.
3. Methodological Framework
3.1 Source–Sink Identification
Targeted sampling upstream and downstream of recharge points
can reveal flow connectivity. Species-specific assays (e.g., qPCR) allow
precise detection of DNA sources.
3.2 Dual-Tracer Experiments
Pairing eDNA with dyes or isotopes enables cross-validation.
For instance, simultaneous dye injection and eDNA sampling at discharge points
can strengthen inference of connectivity.
3.3 Decay and Persistence Experiments
Introducing controlled DNA fragments or tissues into cave
pools allows quantification of decay rates under varying physicochemical
conditions.
3.4 Metabarcoding for Community-Level Insights
Instead of single taxa, high-throughput sequencing of eDNA
allows entire communities to be traced, offering ecosystem-wide connectivity
insights.
4. Case Studies
- Karst
systems: Korbel et al. (2024) detected invertebrate DNA moving through
conduits, validating connectivity hypotheses.
- River
networks: Carraro et al. (2018) applied eDNA modelling to infer
distribution and abundance patterns influenced by hydrological transport.
- Porous
substrates: Shogren et al. (2017) demonstrated eDNA movement through
sediments, analogous to solute transport models.
5. Challenges and Limitations
- Decay
variability: eDNA degrades at rates highly dependent on environmental
conditions, requiring site-specific calibration.
- Non-point
sources: Recharge and organic matter inputs confound signal
interpretation.
- Transport
vs. presence: Detection does not guarantee local occupancy but may
reflect transport from upstream.
- Quantification
difficulties: DNA concentrations are not yet dependable proxies for
biomass or flow velocity.
6. Integrative Conceptual Framework
Figure 1 – A
schematic comparing the transport of a classical dye tracer (blue arrows) vs.
eDNA (green arrows, showing decay over distance) in a karst aquifer.
Figure 2 – A
conceptual framework diagram showing how classical tracers, eDNA approaches,
and hydrological models integrate to produce combined insights into groundwater
connectivity and subterranean ecology.
The dual role of eDNA as both ecological signal and
hydrological tracer presents a change in basic assumptions in groundwater
research. While limitations remain, particularly in calibration and
interpretation, the method has potential to provide bio-hydrological insights
unavailable through conventional tracers. The integration of molecular tools
with hydrogeological modelling could open new research frontiers in
subterranean connectivity, biodiversity conservation, and aquifer management.
8. Conclusion
The use of eDNA as a hydrological tracer is still in its
infancy, but early studies highlight significant promise. By complementing
classical tracers with biological information, eDNA can provide deeper insights
into groundwater systems. Standardisation of methods, controlled experiments,
and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to realise its full
potential.
References
Carraro, L., Hartikainen, H., Jokela, J. & Bertuzzo, E.
(2018) Estimating species distribution and abundance in river networks using
eDNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(46),
11724–11729.
Collins, R.A., Wangensteen, O.S., Sims, D.W., Genner, M.J.
& Mariani, S. (2018) Persistence of environmental DNA in marine systems. Communications
Biology, 1(1), 185.
Deiner, K., Bik, H.M., Mächler, E., Seymour, M.,
Lacoursière-Roussel, A., Altermatt, F., Creer, S., Bista, I., Lodge, D.M., de
Vere, N., Pfrender, M.E. & Bernatchez, L. (2017) Environmental DNA
metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Molecular
Ecology, 26(21), 5872–5895.
Field, M.S. (2002) The QTRACER2 program for
tracer-breakthrough curve analysis for tracer tests in karstic aquifers and
other hydrologic systems. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report.
Käss, W. (2004) Tracing Technique in Geohydrology.
Rotterdam: Balkema.
Kendall, C. & McDonnell, J.J. (1998) Isotope Tracers
in Catchment Hydrology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Harvey, R.W., George, L.H., Smith, R.L. & LeBlanc, D.R.
(1989) Transport of microspheres and indigenous bacteria through a sandy
aquifer: Results of natural- and forced-gradient tracer experiments. Environmental
Science & Technology, 23(1), 51–56.
Goldscheider, N., Hunkeler, D. & Rossi, P. (2006)
Review: Microbial biogeography in karst aquifers: Review and research
perspectives. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(3), 347–360.
Korbel, K.L., Hose, G.C., Carini, G. & Seymour, J.R.
(2024) Detection, movement and persistence of invertebrate eDNA in subterranean
systems. Molecular Ecology Resources, 24(2), 211–225.
Shogren, A.J., Tank, J.L., Andruszkiewicz, E.A., Olds, B.
& Jerde, C.L. (2017) Modelling the transport of environmental DNA through a
porous substrate. Freshwater Biology, 62(1), 97–107.
Smart, P.L. & Laidlaw, I.M.S. (1977) An evaluation of
some fluorescent dyes for water tracing. Water Resources Research,
13(1), 15–33.
Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M. & Rieseberg,
L.H. (2012) Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1789–1793.
Comments